A Robust Control Scheme for Autonomous Vehicles under Sensor Perception Bias
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ycc5y027Keywords:
Robust control; Sensor bias; Multisensor fusion; Digital twin; Fault diagnosis; Engineering stability.Abstract
The challenge of ensuring robust autonomous driving control under sensor perception bias arises from the coupling among uncertainties in perception, hydraulics, computation, and actuation. A single deterministic controller or classifier cannot guarantee safety in such conditions. This paper proposes a diagnostic and control framework that integrates bias-aware residual construction, model-predictive reasoning, and conservative fallback rules using multi-sensor inputs. Parametrisation will be employed to obtain the study data instead of the field claim data, and all indicators are design variables for repeated engineering evaluations. The five tables are sensor channel information, disturbance examples, diagnostic thresholds, control responses and robustness indicators; the two formulas are the residual score and the weighted stability index. Based on the above results, the proposed framework can reduce false alarms and ensure the normal operation of the system in all circumstances; that is to say, if the input signal is biased, there is a time lag, or some data are missing. Finally, the added content will provide the basis for the fault, model limitation and practical control measures to form an auditable process in accordance with the requirements of regular engineering publications.
Downloads
References
[1] Chen, Y., Sun, Y., Li, J., et al. (2025). Tube based robust model predictive control for autonomous vehicle with complex road scenarios. Applied Sciences, 15(12), 6471. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126471
[2] Matos, F., Durães, J., & Cunha, J. (2025). Simulating the effects of sensor failures on autonomous vehicles for safety evaluation. Informatics, 12(3), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics12030094
[3] Qian, H., Wang, M., Zhu, M., et al. (2025). A review of multi sensor fusion in autonomous driving. Sensors, 25(19), 6033. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25196033
[4] Viktor, P., & Kiss, G. (2026). Sensors in self driving vehicles: A detailed literature review and new trends. Sensors, 26(7), 2153. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26072153
[5] Kim, H., & Kim, W. (2026). Active fault tolerant control for steering actuator bias in autonomous vehicles using adaptive sliding mode observer. Sensors, 26(5), 1680. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26051680
[6] Rahim, M. A., Rokonuzzaman, M., Alqumsan, A. A., et al. (2025). Regional pole placement based robust lateral controller for autonomous ground vehicles considering uncertainty. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 194, 105121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2025.105121
[7] Rodriguez Arozamena, M., Matute, J., Araluce, J., et al. (2025). Fault tolerance and fallback strategies in connected and automated vehicles: A review. IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 6, 915 937. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJITS.2025.3583787
[8] Bai, G. Y., Li, J., Shi, Y. C., et al. (2026). Robust autonomous driving via vulnerability aware co optimization framework against safety critical scenarios. IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 7, 1107 1122. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJITS.2026.3680881
[9] Woodward, B., & Kliestik, T. (2021). Intelligent transportation applications, autonomous vehicle perception sensor data, and decision making self driving car control algorithms in smart sustainable urban mobility systems. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 13(2), 51 64. https://doi.org/10.22381/crlsj13220214
[10] SAE International. (2021). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on road motor vehicles (SAE J3016 2021 Standard).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








