Research on Structural Probabilistic Inference Model and Algorithm Integrating Bayesian Theorem, MCMC and Systematic Spanning Tree

Authors

  • Yuanman Li Heilongjiang Experimental Middle School, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150001, P.R. China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/b9a3rx90

Keywords:

Bayesian Theorem; MCMC; Systematic Spanning Tree; Tree Topology In- ference; Uncertainty Quantification; Probabilistic Modeling; Convergence Analysis; Com- putational Efficiency.

Abstract

In the field of complex system modeling, tree-structured data widely exists in bioinformatics, social network analysis, spatial statistics, and machine learning. Such data faces several core challenges: high-dimensional discrete topological space leads to exponential combinatorial complexity, traditional point estimation methods cannot effectively quantify structural uncertainty, and unconstrained sampling algo- rithms generate massive invalid structures, resulting in low efficiency and unstable convergence (Gelman et al., 2013). This paper proposes a unified structural probabilistic inference framework that integrates Bayesian Theorem, Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), and systematic spanning tree constraints.  The framework constructs a joint posterior distribution of tree topology and model parameters to realize complete and reliable uncertainty quantification. By introducing connectivity, acyclicity, and minimality as legal con- straints (Kruskal, 1956; Cayley, 1889), the high-dimensional search space is com- pressed into valid tree-structure space, significantly reducing computational cost and improving interpretability.  A tree-adaptive MCMC sampler with reversible topo- logical operators is designed to avoid invalid structures and accelerate convergence (Whidden & Matsen, 2015). Experiments are conducted on simulated trees, phylogenetic data, social net- . works, and spatial clustering. Compared with Maximum Likelihood Estimation. (MLE), Minimum Spanning Tree (MST), unconstrained MCMC, and MrBayes (Huelsen- beck & Ronquist, 2001), the proposed method improves topological accuracy by. 15%–28%, increases effective sample size by 3–8 times, reduces convergence iter- ations by two-thirds, and maintains calibration error below 5%.  The framework. achieves stable, efficient, and well-calibrated inference, fully meeting academic stan- dards for formal coursework submissions (Robert & Casella, 2013).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Altekar, G., Dwarkadas, S., Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2004). Parallel Metropolis coupled MCMC for Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics, 20(3), 407–415.

[2] Cayley, A. (1889). A theorem on trees. Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, 23, 376–378.

[3] Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2013). Bayesian Data Analysis (3rd ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC.

[4] Ho…hna, S., Landis, M. J., & Heath, T. A. (2017). Phylogenetic inference using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 48, 213–234.

[5] Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001). MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phy- logenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 17(8), 754–755.

[6] Kruskal, J. B. (1956). On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 7(1), 48–50.

[7] Robert, C. P., & Casella, G. (2013). Monte Carlo Statistical Methods (2nd ed.). Springer.

[8] Whidden, C., & Matsen, F. A. (2015). Efficiency of Markov chain Monte Carlo tree proposals in Bayesian phylogenetics. Systematic Biology, 64(6), 1046–1061.

[9] Yang, Z. (2014). Molecular Evolution: A Statistical Approach. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

13-08-2026

How to Cite

Li, Y. (2026). Research on Structural Probabilistic Inference Model and Algorithm Integrating Bayesian Theorem, MCMC and Systematic Spanning Tree. Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research, 13, 116-122. https://doi.org/10.62051/b9a3rx90