Assessing Environmental Sustainability of Sport Mega-Events: A State-Pressure-Impact-Response Framework with Application to Super Bowl and Olympics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/fh4rb974Keywords:
Sport Mega-Events; Environmental Sustainability; SPIR Model; Analytic Hierarchy Process; Super Bowl; Olympic Games; Venue SelectionAbstract
Sport mega-events generate substantial economic benefits but impose significant environ- mental pressures on host cities. This study develops a comprehensive State-Pressure-Impact- Response (SPIR) framework to quantitatively assess environmental sustainability across carbon, water, waste, and energy dimensions. The model integrates a city’s baseline environmental ca- pacity (State) with event-driven pressures (on-site and of-site) through a nonlinear logistic response function, yielding a Sustainable Event Impact Score (SEIS). Nine weighted indicators are determined via Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), emphasizing grid carbon emissions and spectator travel as dominant factors. Applied to 22 potential Super Bowl host cities, Indianapo- lis emerges as optimal (SEIS = 0.1788), followed by Minneapolis and Pittsburgh. Model exten- sion to Summer Olympics accounts for multi-venue configurations and extended event duration through temporal integration; Toronto (SEIS = 0.17) outperforms Singapore and Madrid due to cleaner energy infrastructure. Sensitivity analysis confirms robustness to parameter variations except on-site/of-site pressure weighting. An economic externality optimization framework demonstrates integration of environmental costs into venue selection. Results provide decision support for sustainable mega-event planning.
Downloads
References
[1] C. G. Silva and C. Ricketts, “Mega sporting events and air pollution: The case of the Super Bowl,” J. Environ. Manage. Tourism, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 504–511, 2016.
[2] L. Abrams, “Earth vs. the Super Bowl: America’s high holiday of waste,” Salon, Feb. 2, 2014.
[3] OECD, Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2008.
[4] OECD, Impact Indicators for Culture, Sports and Business Events, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023.
[5] S. Cerezo-Esteve et al., “The environmental impact of major sport events: A systematic review,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 20, p. 13581, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013581
[6] C. L. Folt et al., “Synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors,” Limnol. Oceanogr., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 864–877, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1999.44.3_part_2.0864
[7] U.S. EPA, eGRID2022 Summary Tables, Washington, DC: U.S. EPA, 2024.
[8] World Resources Institute, “Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas,” https://www.wri.org/ applications/aqueduct/water-risk-atlas.
[9] Ball Corporation, 50 States of Recycling, 2023 Edition, 2023.
[10] BusinessWaste.com, “Super Bowl sustainability,” https://businesswaste.com/news/ super-bowl-sustainability.
[11] Fox Weather, “Super Bowl: Entergy, New Orleans Superdome power,” https://www. foxweather.com, 2024.
[12] University of Michigan School of Public Health, “Apple Hearing Study: Super Bowl noise ex- posure,” 2025.
[13] N. Watanabe, G. Yan, and C. McLeod, “Impact of sporting events on air pollution,” Sustain- ability, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 5568, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065568
[14] U.S. Census Bureau, “ACS 5-Year Estimates: Table S0801,” 2024.
[15] Rockport Analytics, Super Bowl LII Economic Impact Report, Minneapolis, 2018.
[16] Greenview, “Hotel Footprinting Tool,” https://www.hotelfootprints.org/.
[17] University of New Orleans, Super Bowl XLVII Visitor Study, New Orleans, 2013.
[18] Tripadvisor LLC, “United States: All you need to know,” 2025.
[19] International Olympic Committee, Olympic Marketing Fact File, Lausanne: IOC, 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








