Forecasting Sustainable Mega-Event Host Cities Using a Random-Forest Composite Index

Authors

  • Zheng Xin Ningbo Xiaoshi High School, Ningbo, China
  • Kechen Li Ningbo Xiaoshi High School, Ningbo, China
  • Zhenghan Zhou Ningbo Xiaoshi High School, Ningbo, China
  • Xiesheng Jiang Ningbo Xiaoshi High School, Ningbo, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/wt1se375

Keywords:

Sustainable event planning; Random Forest; Host-city evaluation; Environmental indicators; Feature importance.

Abstract

Large-scale sporting events such as the Super Bowl and the NBA All-Star Weekend generate substantial social and economic value, but they also impose significant environmental pressures through energy consumption, transportation emissions, and urban infrastructure demands. As sustainability becomes an increasingly important criterion in event planning, host-city evaluation requires data-driven, multi-factor analysis rather than reliance on economic indicators alone. This study develops a quantitative sustainability assessment framework based on a Random Forest model, using multi-dimensional data from U.S. cities between 2019 and 2023. The model predicts 2029 environmental indicators and computes feature-importance weights for key sustainability determinants, including climate conditions, transportation capacity, carbon emissions, energy structure, economic strength, and urban density. These results are integrated into a composite sustainability index to evaluate host-city suitability. The dataset incorporates official statistics on climate, emissions, energy use, transportation infrastructure, and socioeconomic conditions. Results indicate that transportation systems, economic capacity, and emissions intensity are the dominant drivers of sustainable hosting potential. Application to NBA All-Star host-city analysis further reveals event-specific differences in factor importance. Overall, the framework provides an interpretable and scalable tool for sustainable mega-event planning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] National Football League. (2024). NFL Sustainability Report 2023. New York: NFL Enterprise

[2] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). Carbon Emission Statistics of Major U.S. Cities. Washington, D.C.: EPA Press.

[3] Martin, B. (2023). NBA All-Star connects entertainment with a commitment to social impact. NBA.

[4] Bontemps, T. (2025, November 11). NBA presents new All-Star Game format, and selection process. ESPA.

[5] NBA. (2024, June 18). About the NBA.

[6] Renn, O. (2023, July 28). Environmental Sustainability as Factor for Mega Sport Event Support—Empirical Evidence Regarding the Olympic Games and the Football World Cup. MDPI.

[7] Springer Nature Link. (2024, November 27). Rio 2016: Case Study for Mega Events, Urban Mobility, and Flow of People.

[8] Filimonau, V., & Pereira, R. P. T. (2016). Understanding the carbon footprint of mega sport events. E-Review of Tourism Research, 13(1–2), 372–376.

[9] VfL Wolfsburg. (2020). Sustainability report of VfL Wolfsburg 2020. VfL Wolfsburg.

[10] Fédération Internationale de Football Association. (2013). Summary of the 2014 FIFA World Cup Brazil™ carbon footprint (Version 2). FIFA.

[11] Herold, D. M., et al. (2024). Assessing the carbon footprint of spectators’ modal choices at major sport events. Journal of Cleaner Production, 427, Article 131476.

[12] Su, X.-z., Chen, L., & Xu, X. L. (2025). Carbon emission and energy risk management in mega sporting events: Challenges, strategies and pathways. Frontiers in Environmental Science,

[13] National Football League. (2024). NFL Sustainability Report 2023. NFL Enterprises.

[14] Green Sports Alliance. (2022). Sustainable food and material management in sports venues. Green Sports Alliance.

[15] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2023). eGRID 2023 technical guide. U.S. EPA.

[16] Green Sports Alliance. (2022). Environmental responsibility and stadium operations. Green Sports Alliance.

[17] U.S. Department of Energy. (2021). Energy consumption in U.S. broadcasting facilities. U.S. DOE.

[18] EPA SmartWay. (2023). SmartWay carbon emissions and freight sustainability report. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

[19] NFL Green. (2024). NFL Green environmental initiatives report. NFL Enterprises.

[20] Super Bowl 50 Host Committee. (2016). Super Bowl 50 sustainability report. Super Bowl 50 Host Committee.

[21] Green Sports Alliance. (2022). Environmental responsibility and stadium operations report. Green Sports Alliance.

[22] Arizona State University W. P. Carey School of Business. (2024). Economic and logistical determinants of Super Bowl host-city selection. W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University.

[23] Arizona State University W. P. Carey School of Business. (2024). Economic and logistical determinants of Super Bowl host-city selection. W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University.

[24] Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32.

[25] Green Sports Alliance. (2022). Environmental responsibility and stadium operations report. Green Sports Alliance.

[26] Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.

[27] International Olympic Committee. (2021). Olympic Agenda 2020+5: Sustainability and legacy. IOC.

[28] National Basketball Association. (2024). NBA sustainability and operations report. NBA.

[29] NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. (2024). Climate data online. U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

[30] Super Bowl 50 Host Committee. (2016). Super Bowl 50 sustainability report. Super Bowl 50 Host Committee.

[31] Su, X.-Z., Chen, L., & Xu, X.-L. (2025). Carbon emission and energy risk management in mega sporting events: Challenges, strategies and pathways. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1513365.

[32] U.S. Census Bureau. (2024). American community survey. U.S. Census Bureau.

[33] U.S. Department of Transportation. (2023). National transportation statistics. U.S. DOT.

[34] U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2024). State energy profiles. U.S. EIA.

[35] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2023). eGRID 2023 technical guide. U.S. EPA.

[36] Atlanta Conference Centers & Hotels with Meeting Space. (2023, January 5). Discover Atlanta.

[37] Data Commons. (2021). Home - Data Commons. Datacommons.org

[38] Find Inglewood, CA Hotels- Downtown Hotels in Inglewood- Hotel Search by Hotel & Travel Index: Travel Weekly. (2025).

[39] INRIX. (2024). Scorecard. INRIX.

[40] None - Census Reporter. (n.d.). Nuss, S. (2021). United States Cities Database

[41] Office of Highway Policy Information - Policy | Federal Highway Administration. (2025). Dot.gov.

[42] Pasadena, California. (2021, August 2). Wikipedia.

[43] Staff, S. (2013, January 24). SI’s 100 Best Super Bowl Photos - Sports Illustrated. SI; Sports Illustrated.

[44] Time and date. (2025). Climate & Weather Averages. Timeanddate.com.

[45] Top 10 Photos from Super Bowl LIX. (2025). NFL.com.

[46] Weather, W. (2021). Weather in Tampa in February 2021 (Florida) - Detailed Weather Forecast for a Month. World-Weather.info; World Weather.

[47] Weather, W. (2025). Weather in United States for 3 days, for a week or 10 days, Detailed Forecast in United States for 14 days. World-Weather.info; World Weather.

Downloads

Published

13-08-2026

How to Cite

Xin, Z., Li, K., Zhou, Z., & Jiang, X. (2026). Forecasting Sustainable Mega-Event Host Cities Using a Random-Forest Composite Index. Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research, 13, 33-43. https://doi.org/10.62051/wt1se375