A Variable Association Modeling and Dynamic Optimization Approach for Complex System Prediction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/3jarvk03Keywords:
anticipate; multiple linear regression; logistic regression; dynamic correction.Abstract
In this paper, a two-stage modeling framework integrating multivariate statistical analysis and dynamic correction is proposed to address the problems of lack of variable correlation and insufficient modeling of nonlinear influence mechanism in traditional prediction models in complex systems. The key explanatory variables are first screened out based on feature engineering, and the multiple linear regression prediction model and logistic regression model are constructed respectively. To further address the interference of unobserved variables on the prediction results, the prediction model of important influencing factors is innovatively established, and the prediction results are optimized by quantifying the interference intensity of external factors. The empirical study shows that the improved combination model achieves a large improvement in prediction accuracy compared with the traditional prediction model. The modeling method provides a new technical path for accurate prediction of complex systems by establishing an interpret-able variable association system and a dynamic correction mechanism.
Downloads
References
[1] Tchamkerten A , Chaudron P , Girard N ,et al.Career factors related to winning Olympic medals in swimming[J]. PLoS ONE, 2024,19(6): e0304444.
[2] Maszczyk A, Gołaś A, Pietraszewski P, et al. Application of neural and regression models in sports results prediction[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 117: 482-487.
[3] Nicolas Frevel, Daniel Beiderbeck, Sascha L. Schmidt, The impact of technology on sports – A prospective study, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 182: 121838.
[4] Horvat T, Job J. The use of machine learning in sport outcome prediction: A review[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2020, 10(5): e1380.
[5] Bunker R P, Thabtah F. A machine learning framework for sport result prediction[J]. Applied Computing and Informatics, 2019, 15(1): 27-33.
[6] Apostolou K, Tjortjis C. Sports analytics algorithms for performance prediction[C]// 2019 10th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA). IEEE, 2019: 1-4.
[7] Wei Jiang, Julie Josse, Marc Lavielle, Logistic regression with missing covariates—Parameter estimation, model selection and prediction within a joint-modeling framework, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2020, 145: 106907.
[8] Schlembach C, Schmidt S L, Schreyer D, et al. Forecasting the Olympic medal distribution–a socioeconomic machine learning model[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 175: 121314.
[9] Baumer B S, Matthews G J, Nguyen Q. Big ideas in sports analytics and statistical tools for their investigation[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2023, 15(6): e1612.
[10] Turgut, Abdüsselam, Mumcu H E. The effect of couching systems on Olympics success: The case of the United States and the Russian Federation coaching education systems [J].International Journal of Education Technology & Scientific Researches, 2023, 8(23):1040-1069.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








